Full column on the official situation. I'll have a post Friday or Saturday on the actual football in Week 3, which was awesome, and looking forward to Week 4.
I’ll keep it brief about this (Editor's Note: I wasn't) ,
because everyone, up to and including the President of the United States, has
weighed in on the NFL officiating lockout. And much like last year’s player lockout, I
found much of the rhetoric from people who don’t understand the situation to be
maddening. Last year it was “This is just a bunch of millionaires against
billionaires.” This year doesn’t have quite the same catchy phrase, but the
standard throw away joke was that “The Real Refs Weren’t Too Great Either.” And
for a while, that’s kind of how I felt. They were bad in preseason, but no one
really thought they wouldn’t have a deal done by Week 1. Then the first week
came and passed without a huge incident (Seattle got an extra timeout that didn’t
impact the game- and it was a weird situation I honestly didn’t know the rule
to) and I thought maybe we’d be OK. But the last few weeks, compounded by a
hugely egregious mistake last night, have bought us to the point of no return.
They are making two different calls, but right here it looks they're doing the YMCA.
Look, I’ve said all along I didn’t
care about them missing holding or pass interference. That’s judgment call
stuff that the regular officials don’t necessarily call consistently all the
time. My problem all along has been with the administration of the game. In the
first preseason game I watched, the Giants were given an extra play to end the
game, when a penalty should have resulted in a 10-second run-off. It was the first preseason game and they
ended up getting sacked anyway, so it didn’t mean anything at the time, but
that kind of concerned me from the start. Because that’s not a thing you get
better at with practice: that’s a black and white application of the rule.
But nothing happened the first 47
games of the season that directly impacted the outcome of a game in the closing
seconds. That all ended last night. For
those of you who didn’t get to see it, here’s the video, starting at about the
25 second mark:
OK, that wasn’t the actual clip (like anyone hasn’t seen it
already yet). But it’s a pretty damn spot on representation of what happened.
Hail Mary into the end zone, two guys go up, both come down.* Joint possession
is ruled, which goes to the Offense by rule. Touchdown Seattle, game over. If
they overturn it, Interception, Green Bay, Game over. This was the nightmare
scenario for the refs and the NFL: there was no safe way out. If one of the
options would have sent the game to Overtime, or extended the game, you can bet
your ass they would have made that ruling upon review. In this case, I think
they just went with the home team.
*I don’t even consider the fact that Golden Tate pushed off.
Everyone pushes off on those plays. You’re not getting that call there, let’s
just leave that part out of it.
I miss Mike Carey. He always looks like he's doing half of The Rock's People's Elbow signal. Plus he was the ref for Super Bowl 42.
For the record, I actually don’t think the call was that
horrendously egregious. That’s a killer situation, and one of the vaguest areas
of the rulebook concerns joint possession. Because technically Tate did have
his hand on the ball the whole way. Does that equal possession? Certainly MD
Jennings had “more possession,” but is that even a thing? Obviously, I believe
the call should have been overturned on review, but my point is this wasn’t
some case of outright corruption, or even the worst call I can remember. That
would be this:
What it is, however, is the straw
that broke the camel’s back. Before you had people sort of working around the
edges of this thing. Now, players, coaches, and even broadcasters usually very
loyal to the NFL are openly criticizing them DURING games. The tipping point
for all sports scandals is when politicians get involved. Today, President
Obama, VP Candidate Paul Ryan, the Governor of Wisconsin, and Newt Gingrich all
weighed on this, and ham-fistedly tried to work it into their ongoing agendas.
The New Jersey State Legislature announced they are considering a bill banning
all NFL games in their state with replacement refs, citing sub-standard working
conditions. Obviously that’s grandstanding, likely illegal and would never pass, but I say
if it puts the Giants in Yankee Stadium and the Jets somewhere in Southeast
Asia, I’d be fine with it for a while.
But people are so off base on
assigning blame in this instance, and that’s what frustrates me. It’s not at
all these guys trying their best as replacement refs. They’re mostly High
School and small-College refs. If this were SEC officials, I doubt the drop-off
would be that severe. If we played 3 on 3 basketball, and you told me to stick
the 22 year old starting point guard for his college team, you couldn’t get
pissed at me when I couldn’t cover him. He’s just too fast.
People also don’t know what they
are talking about when they blame Roger Goddell. The Commissioner of the NFL
works for the owners. On financial matters, he does their bidding. They want
him to take a hard-line, so he does. I’m not crazy about a lot of his ideas,
but in this instance, if the majority of owners wanted a deal done with the
officials, it’d be done. So the owners
have to shoulder a bit of blame here. They can easily afford to pay what these
guys want, with almost no noticeable impact on their finances.
But I have to be honest, the
officials (the real, locked-out ones) deserve a lot of blame here too. The big
issue is the pension. The NFL wants to do away with the non-contributory
pensions they give the NFL officials, who makes over 100,000 dollars a year as
part time employees. A few things, if you make over 100 grand a year at
something, that means you don’t need another job, so you’re really not a part
time employee. You may not get health benefits, but a job you make a 100,000
dollars a year to work a few days a week, half the year is a GOOD job, not a
part-time job. Secondly, who the hell has a non-contributory pension nowadays?
It’s not something companies, even those who print money, are going to be able
to afford to do much longer. The NFL even said they would honor the existing
pensions, and stop offering them to all new officials. That’s a pretty generous
bargaining move.
The other, smaller, issues are as
follows: The NFL wants to increase the number of crews, so that crews that
consistently earn low grades can be “benched” in favor of higher-performers.
They want to make some officials full-time, and add the number of officials
they employ. This would admittedly divide the wage pool, forcing most officials
to make less annually. That’s definitely a legitimate gripe, but what the NFL
asking here is far less than what they made the players swallow last year. Not
a perfect comparison, but still one worth looking at.
![]() |
This is where I watch football every week. Essentially my Crack Den. Also one of the few moments when Mook is not sticking his head in my lap, trying to steal pretzels or pizza crusts.
But the final finger gets pointed
back to all of us. Because we put up with it. We are all so addicted to the
NFL, that we let them get away with basically anything. The PSL is one of the
most blatant “fuck you” moves to fans in general that I’ve ever seen. The
lockout last year exposed the avarice of the men who run this sport, far
surpassing even the owners of other sports. Why do they do it? Because they can.
Because unlike every other sport, the NFL becomes incorporated into people’s
lifestyles during the 5 months it’s on. It’s perfectly acceptable to watch 9
hours of football every Sunday, but with the exception of the first weekend of
the NCAA Tournament, you can’t do that with any other sport. Between fantasy
leagues, picks pools, suicide pools, and the games themselves, most of the guys
I know have a large portion of their social lives devoted to football from
September to January. And we’re not going to give that up over a labor dispute
with the officials. So they’ll settle this, re-establish equilibrium, and then
18 months from now, some other nonsense will pop up (my guess is a serious push
towards an international franchise). We’ll
all piss and moan, but like many people in a one-sided relationship, we’ll keep
coming back, because we know they love us, they just have a funny way of
showing it.



Couldn't agree more. No matter how pissed off I get watching it, bitching and moaning, guess what, next Sunday I'll spend the whole day watching it.
ReplyDeleteNeumann, I agree with you about the whole thing. We will tune in, because we have shit else to do, and I know that's a huge chunk of the revenue. The only thing I think might be effected is the supplemental stuff like merchandise or attendance. I think that's the only real leverage fans will have because, like you said, it is so embedded in our culture to watch on Sunday. With a little perspective, one can see that Goodell WANTS to be the punching bag/sacrificial lamb. He's taking the shots so that the owners don't have to, and they can stay out of the media thus saving their rep and in turn ticket sales.
ReplyDeleteI think the resolution will come soon, but there's less of a guarantee of that because these are not players with no other jobs recklessly burning through cash---these are responsible middle-aged men with other well-paying jobs---they might not need this. So, though it seems they have NO leverage, why not hang back while the Shield takes a few clean shots, and maybe take Goliath down a peg or two. After all, is this not the most appreciation a referee has ever been given?